Startup Accelerator
Human Capital Accelerator
Youth Accelerator
Latest News
iStart Valley Interns Break Barriers, Land Ivy League Admissions
iStart Valley is excited to share the remarkable achievements of its high school internship alumni who have secured their places at the prestigious...
Top 10 Reasons our programs are the best
Prepare your children for the unstoppable march of future technologies that are reshaping our world with iStart Valley’s Human Capital Accelerator...
High School Scholarship 2024
Outstanding Achievement Scholarship - $3000 Igniting the Spark of Innovation in Tomorrow's Leaders At iStart Valley, we believe in fostering the...
iStart Valley ranked #10 on 2022 MAVS Top 100 Businesses
iStart Valley has been ranked #10 on 2022 MAVS Top 100 Businesses. MAVS Top 100 Businesses in 2022. iStart Valley provides resources to accelerate...
Trending Now
Eric Schmidt was supposed to buy a yacht once owned by a Russian oligarch. Here's the one he bought instead.
Jan Woitas/picture alliance via Getty Images
Eric Schmidt backed out of buying the Alfa Nero megayacht last year.He instead purchased the Kismet, formerly owned by Shahid Khan, and renamed her Whisper.The ship — one of the biggest yachts owned by a tech billionaire —was listed for about $161 million.Last year, Eric Schmidt made waves in the yachting community when news came out that he was the soon-to-be owner of the Alfa Nero, an 81-meter megayacht that belonged to a sanctioned Russian oligarch.
The former Google CEO, who is worth $32.1 billion, per Bloomberg, was to pay $67.6 million for the yacht, which was being auctioned off by the government of Antigua and Barbuda, where the ship had been moored since February 2022, the month Russia invaded Ukraine. The small Caribbean nation had been spending $28,000 a week simply to maintain the mammoth boat.
But as the sale proceedings went on, legal challenges piled up as people laid claim to Alfa Nero, and Schmidt backed out of the deal.
It didn't take long for him to rebound, though. In September 2023, just three months after he won the Alfa Nero auction, the billionaire purchased Kismet, renaming her Whisper, Business Insider has learned.
A spokesperson for Schmidt declined to comment to Business Insider.
Schmidt's yacht — which he renamed Whisper — boasts two helicopter pads, one of which becomes a basketball court.Marcus Brandt/picture alliance via Getty Images
The 95-meter-long yacht, built by the renowned German shipyard Lürssen and delivered in 2014, was formerly owned by the Jacksonville Jaguar's billionaire owner, Shahid Khan — hence images of the cat featured on her figurehead and throughout her decor.
Whisper, which can fit at least a dozen guests and a crew of 28 features a master deck with a private jacuzzi, as well as a full-service spa, lap pool, hammam, and outdoor fireplace. Made for entertaining, the megayacht has a cinema, a grand piano, and two helipads — one of which doubles as a basketball court and the other than transforms into a disco.
Her interior was designed to "create a feeling of relaxed opulence, based on a 'Champagne & Caviar' theme," according to the brokerage that sold the ship.
While the yacht's final sale price was not public, she was listed for 149 million euros (about $161 million at current exchange rates).
At a charity auction in January, one week aboard the ship went for $2.4 million, according to industry outlet Yacht Charter Fleet — a steal, considering she typically goes for $3 million a week.
This college town is experimenting with giving low-income entrepreneurs and gig workers $12,672, no strings attached
pawel.gaul / Getty Images
Ann Arbor is providing 24 monthly payments of $528 to low-income residents.The guaranteed basic-income program focused on entrepreneurs, small business owners, and gig workers.Past GBI participants reported using the money to pay for rent, groceries, and medicine.Guaranteed basic income helps low-income Americans pay rent and support their families, and Ann Arbor, Michigan is using the model to try something new: helping local entrepreneurs.
Ann Arbor's program, called Guaranteed Income to Grow Ann Arbor, is giving low- and moderate-income residents $528 a month, no strings attached. The GBI pilot will specifically benefit entrepreneurs, small business owners, and gig workers.
Monthly cash payments began in January and will continue through the end of 2025. Eligible participants have an income at or below 225% of the federal poverty line — which is $32,805 for an individual and $67,500 for a family of four.
Throughout the US, guaranteed basic income has become an increasingly popular poverty-solution strategy. Over 50 municipalities have tried the GBI model since 2019, offering low-income participants between $100 and $1,000 a month, no strings attached for one to five years.
The program eligibility requirements also list a broad definition of entrepreneurship: participants can have side hustles, be independent contractors, own small businesses, or hope to start a small business. Local musicians and artists who met the income criteria could also apply.
"Starting and sustaining a business is a dream of many people, yet for those with lower incomes, it can be a difficult dream to achieve," program researchers wrote. "This pilot will help us learn whether guaranteed income payments can be an effective way to help some entrepreneurs with their business efforts."
Basic income differs from traditional Social Services because participants can use the money however they choose, instead of on specific spending categories. GBI participants in cities like San Antonio and Denver told Business Insider that cash payments allowed them to secure housing, afford groceries, pay off debt, and buy clothes and school supplies for their children.
"You're deciding what's best for your family, you're the expert on your family," Monique Gonzalez, a participant in San Antonio's GBI program, previously told BI. "Being able to utilize these funds in a manner that puts you back into control — it boosts your confidence."
Ann Arbor GBI pilot could help low-income entrepreneurs build their businesses
Before launching Guaranteed Income to Grow Ann Arbor, the city was already a hub for technology and small businesses. Nearly half of the startup companies in Michigan are located in the Ann Arbor area, according to an entrepreneurial ecosystem report of the state by the nonprofit research company Entrypoint.
The city is pulling $1.6 million for the GBI pilot from the 2021 American Rescue Plan Act, pandemic-era economic recovery funds that have commonly been used to fund basic income. The Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation also contributed money, and the University of Michigan will be paying the salaries of program researchers.
The program is a randomized control trial: of the total 200 participants enrolled, 100 people will receive payments, while the other 100 will not. All participants will be surveyed about their experience by researchers at the University of Michigan.
Similar to Ann Arbor, more GBI pilots are choosing to provide assistance to specific demographics. For example, a program in Atlanta is open to low-income Black women, a program in Denver provides aid to people experiencing homelessness, and Flint, Michigan's program is giving funds to new mothers.
And, in light of past success, new programs are being created. Chicago announced in April that it restarted its previous GBI program that offered low-income residents $500 a month.
Even so, GBI continues to face opposition from Republican state legislators.
A GBI program in Harris County, Texas is being challenged by Attorney General Ken Paxton, who called the program "unconstitutional." While the state Supreme Court is reviewing the case, 1,928 families will not receive their cash payments, which were set to begin April 24.
Other lawmakers have called basic income "socialist," and said it will make low-income people too dependent on government assistance. Iowa, Arizona, and South Dakota have also all made efforts to ban GBI programs.
Have you benefited from a guaranteed basic-income program? Are you open to sharing how you spent the money? If so, reach out to this reporter at allisonkelly@insider.com.
As high-paying jobs become harder to get, more Americans are looking to Uber and Lyft for extra income
Jeffrey Greenberg/Universal Images Group via Getty Images
Gig work, in particular ride-hailing for companies like Uber and Lyft, is getting more popular.Some Americans are turning to it as cost-of-living pressures persist and the job market slows.It might not be the solution for everyone in need of extra income.More and more Americans are taking up gig work for companies like Uber and Lyft — in part because some have fewer options to land high-paying jobs.
The share of Bank of America customers receiving income from ride-hailing nearly tripled from less than 0.4% in March 2020 to about 1.2% as of March, exceeding pre-pandemic levels, according to a Bank of America Institute report that analyzed internal company data and was published in late April. Among BofA customers, ride-hailing became the most common source of gig income over the last year, passing deliveries, vacation rentals, and social commerce.
BofA also found that many more Americans are going "all in" on gig work. The share of gig workers who received gig income every month of the year increased from about 3% in the 12 months preceding February 2023 to 4% in the 12 months preceding February 2024 — much of this growth came from ride-hailing. Since 2022, it's become increasingly common for gig workers not to have a traditional job, compared to those who do it as a side hustle, BofA found.
Some Americans may be turning to gig work like ride-hailing because they've struggled to boost their income. Job growth is slowing, job openings have fallen from record levels, and April data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics released Friday suggests it's getting more difficult to find higher-wage employment.
In April, the sectors that added the most job growth were lower-paying, including retail trade, wholesale trade, transportation and warehousing, and healthcare and social services. Higher-paying sectors, including manufacturing, construction, and professional services, saw slower job growth. What's more, the unemployment rate rose to 3.9%, up from 3.8% in March.
Additionally, a recent Vanguard report found that the hiring rate has held steady for workers who earn less than $55,000 a year, but has fallen for workers in the top third of earners, who make over $96,000, to its lowest level since 2014.
"Where there's been job growth has not been sectors where there has been high wage growth," Kate Bahn, the chief economist and SVP of research at the Institute for Women's Policy Research, previously told BI.
BofA noted that growth in gig employment like ride-hailing slowed in 2022 when rising wages led more workers to pursue traditional jobs. But as wage growth slowed in 2023, the number of gig workers began to tick up again, BofA found. In January 2023, wages rose 6.3% compared to the prior year, according to the Atlanta Fed. By November, this had fallen to 5.6% and was 5.2% as of March 2024.
Why ride-hailing is getting more popular
The BofA report gave several reasons Americans in need of cash might be flocking to ride-hailing in particular.
BofA hypothesized that ride-hailing's growth, relative to a gig like food delivery, may have been driven by a shift in Americans' spending patterns as pandemic conditions have eased.
"This mirrors the pivot in consumer spending towards out-of-home services and away from in-home services and goods, with more people eating out, for example, rather than ordering in," the report said.
Additionally, BofA found that people with ride-hailing income earned, on average, more a month than those who did delivery gig work. Vacation rental was the highest-earning gig BofA measured, but this is only accessible to people with a home to rent out.
Lastly, BofA said that some people who valued public transportation pre-pandemic have shifted to using ridesharing for some trips, given that demand for public transportation is well below pre-pandemic levels while traffic levels are about equivalent.
Younger generations account for much of the rise in ride-hailing numbers.
BofA found that ride-hailing was the most common gig for millennials and Gen X. More than 30% of all gig workers in these generations had ride-hailing income, compared to about 20% for Gen Z and 25% for boomers.
While some young people could value the supplementary income gig work can provide — particularly if they're struggling to pay the bills — others may end up disappointed.
Over the last year, several Uber and Lyft drivers have told BI that ride-hailing is less profitable than it used to be. They've accused ride-hailing giants of taking a bigger cut of rider fares and said increased driver competition and high vehicle expenses have hurt their earnings. These frustrations have led to driver protests and calls for higher guaranteed pay.
Have you recently become a gig driver for companies like Uber and Lyft? What were your motivations? Reach out to these reporters at jzinkula@businessinsider.com and nsheidlower@businessinsider.com.
A Florida Gen Xer who earned over $300,000 secretly working multiple remote jobs shares why he's 'far from rich'
howtogoto/Getty Images
A Florida-based Gen Xer made over $300,000 in 2023 secretly working multiple remote tech jobs. While the extra income has allowed him to travel more, he still feels "far from rich," he said.He shared how his higher income has impacted his relationships and how he's spending the money.In 2021, Robert was making roughly $180,000 a year from his tech job, but when his workflow slowed, he feared a layoff may be coming soon.
He decided to start looking for another role and eventually found one that paid $190,000 a year, he previously told Business Insider via email. But before he resigned from his current job, he recalled hearing about a former coworker who was making several hundred thousand dollars secretly working two jobs.
After thinking it over, Robert decided to try to juggle both roles at the same time. That choice changed his life.
In 2023, Robert earned over $300,000 across multiple remote roles, according to documents viewed by BI. He said the extra income allowed his partner to quit their job and made it possible for him to take several expensive vacations, including a roughly $20,000 cruise.
The Gen Xer, a Florida resident, is among the "overemployed" Americans who are secretly working multiple remote jobs to boost their incomes. Over the past year, Business Insider has interviewed more than a dozen job jugglers, many of whom are in the IT and tech industries, who've used the extra money to pay off debt, save for retirement, and afford weight-loss drugs. While some employers may be fine with their workers having a second job, doing so without company approval could have repercussions if a worker is found out.
For Robert, the income from multiple jobs decision has made it possible for him to travel more. Over the last few years, he estimates he spent between $28,000 and $35,000 in total annual travel expenses. Some of his recent trips included Yellowstone, the Galápagos Islands, and Las Vegas.
"We now spend a lot more time on vacations," he said. "We spend a lot on travel because life is more about experiences and memories than material things."
Still, Robert considers himself to be "far from rich," in part because it takes more than a couple of years with a higher income to ensure financial security in the long term, he said. He experienced several job separations in the past, so he knows his jobs aren't guaranteed to last. Additionally, he said he made some bad decisions when he was younger that set back his finances.
"We don't live an extravagant life by any means," he said.
Robert shared how earning more has impacted his relationships with his partner and family — and how he's spending the money.
The extra income goes to travel, food, home, and family
Robert said making more money hasn't changed his relationship with his partner much. But it has been good for his relationships with his family, as it's made it possible for him to visit them more often.
He said it's also allowed him to provide some family members with financial support — he estimated that he spends about $5,000 to $6,000 a year helping out relatives. But finding the right balance can be tricky.
"I am careful with that because I know financial help to some actually is a disservice and prevents people from pushing themselves to succeed," he said.
Aside from family and travel, Robert said he spends most of his money on food and his home.
Food is something he doesn't typically budget for, but these expenses can add up, particularly when he travels, he said. On a five-day trip earlier this year, he said he spent about $700 on food, including $225 on one meal for himself and two family members. He estimated that in the typical month, he spends between $1,500 to $2,000 on food.
"We eat well," he said. "I grew up poor with little to no good food and that is something I do not skimp on."
Robert's housing expenses include a monthly mortgage payment — he said he has about $380,000 left on his loan balance.
He's also putting over $100,000 into refurbishing his home, according to documents viewed by BI. He said this money is going toward a new deck with a high-end hot tub, his basement, and an over 1000-square-foot garage, which he said will be used for two vehicles, a gym, and storage. He said he's taken out loans to fund some of this spending.
Additionally, Robert said he's bought two vehicles in recent years, — both of which are mostly paid off — and that he tries to put as much money in his 401(k) account as he can.
However, Robert said he's not satisfied with the state of his finances.
"My partner and I would like to have no debts in five years unless we invest in a vacation home for us and the family," he said. "We would also like to have $250,000 saved up in six or seven years which is separate from our retirement accounts."
Are you working multiple remote jobs at the same time and willing to provide details about your pay and schedule? If so, reach out to this reporter at jzinkula@businessinsider.com.
Mortgage Interest Rates Today, May 7, 2024 | Rates Ease Thanks to Cooling Job Market
The offers and details on this page may have updated or changed since the time of publication. See our article on Business Insider for current information.
Affiliate links for the products on this page are from partners that compensate us (see our advertiser disclosure with our list of partners for more details). However, our opinions are our own. See how we rate mortgages to write unbiased product reviews.
Mortgage rates are down slightly following the release of April's softer-than-expected jobs report. Average 30-year mortgage rates are now back below 7%, according to Zillow data.
Hot inflation data pushed mortgage rates up last month. But last week, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the US economy added 175,000 jobs in April, way below the 238,000 forecast, and a significant slowdown from March. This is a sign that the economy is cooling off, which means the Federal Reserve could start cutting the federal funds rate sooner than expected. That would allow mortgage rates to fall further.
Fed Chair Jerome Powell said during a press conference last week that "unexpected weakening in the labor market" could be a reason for policymakers to start lowering rates. Though one month of data is unlikely to get the Fed to cut rates, if we see more signs of slowing in the next few months, we could get a cut at the Fed's meeting in September.
Mortgage Rates Today
Mortgage Refinance Rates Today
Mortgage Calculator
Use our free mortgage calculator to see how today's mortgage rates will affect your monthly and long-term payments.
By plugging in different term lengths and interest rates, you'll see how your monthly payment could change.
30-Year Fixed Mortgage Rates
The average 30-year fixed mortgage rate was 7.22% last week, according to Freddie Mac. This is five basis points higher than it was the week before.
The 30-year fixed-rate mortgage is the most common type of home loan. With this type of mortgage, you'll pay back what you borrowed over 30 years, and your interest rate won't change for the life of the loan.
The lengthy 30-year term allows you to spread out your payments over a long period of time, meaning you can keep your monthly payments lower and more manageable. The trade-off is that you'll have a higher rate than you would with shorter terms or adjustable rates.
15-Year Fixed Mortgage Rates
Average 15-year mortgage rates were 6.47% last week, according to Freddie Mac data, which is a three-basis-point increase from the previous week.
If you want the predictability that comes with a fixed rate but are looking to spend less on interest over the life of your loan, a 15-year fixed-rate mortgage might be a good fit for you. Because these terms are shorter and have lower rates than 30-year fixed-rate mortgages, you could potentially save tens of thousands of dollars in interest. However, you'll have a higher monthly payment than you would with a longer term.
Are Mortgage Rates Going Down?
Mortgage rates increased throughout most of 2023. But mortgage rates are expected to trend down in the coming months and years.
In the last 12 months, the Consumer Price Index rose by 3.5%. As inflation comes down and the Federal Reserve is able to start cutting the federal funds rate, mortgage rates should fall further as well.
For homeowners looking to leverage their home's value to cover a big purchase — such as a home renovation — a home equity line of credit (HELOC) may be a good option while we wait for mortgage rates to ease. Check out some of our best HELOC lenders to start your search for the right loan for you.
A HELOC is a line of credit that lets you borrow against the equity in your home. It works similarly to a credit card in that you borrow what you need rather than getting the full amount you're borrowing in a lump sum. It also lets you tap into the money you have in your home without replacing your entire mortgage, like you'd do with a cash-out refinance.
Current HELOC rates are relatively low compared to other loan options, including credit cards and personal loans.
How Do Fed Rate Hikes Affect Mortgages?
The Fed aggressively raised the federal funds rate in 2022 and 2023 to slow economic growth and get inflation under control. As a result, mortgage rates spiked.
Mortgage rates aren't directly impacted by changes to the federal funds rate, but they often trend up or down ahead of Fed policy moves. This is because mortgage rates change based on investor demand for mortgage-backed securities, and this demand is often impacted by how investors expect Fed hikes to affect the broader economy.
Now that the Fed has paused hiking rates, mortgage rates have come down a bit. Once the Fed starts cutting rates, which is likely to happen this year, mortgage rates should fall even further.
Microsoft's partnership with OpenAI was 'basically a bet,' says CTO Kevin Scott
Microsoft
Kevin Scott said Microsoft's partnership with OpenAI was a strategic "bet" on Sam Altman's company. The Microsoft CTO gave insight into its investment in the ChatGPT maker on the "Possible" podcast.Scott said Microsoft thought working with OpenAI would "push us to build better infrastructure."Microsoft's chief technology officer said partnering with OpenAI was "basically a bet" on Sam Altman's company.
Kevin Scott gave insight into his decision-making that led to Microsoft's alliance with OpenAI in 2019 on an episode of Reid Hoffman's podcast "Possible" last week.
"This partnership with OpenAI was like basically a bet saying this particular team at the time also understood that this was a game of scaling, compute and doing incredible things with it in a very disciplined way," he said.
Scott, who's been Microsoft CTO since 2017, said he realized pretty early into his tenure that the progress of AI was accelerating.
For Microsoft to remain competitive, he knew it had to advance its infrastructure, which he started to think about how to build in 2018.
In an email sent to Microsoft cofounder Bill Gates and CEO Satya Nadella the following year, Scott said he was "very, very worried" about Google's AI capabilities at the time.
The email, which was recently made public as part of the Department of Justice's antitrust case against Google, had the subject line "Thoughts on OpenAI." It was sent just weeks before Microsoft announced its $1 billion investment in OpenAI and subsequent partnership. A large section of Scott's email was redacted.
Scott also told the podcast that the key drivers behind the partnership were knowing Microsoft couldn't do everything by itself, and realizing OpenAI could forecast what it could get from investing in computing.
"And I was like, 'if we work with them, they will push us to build better infrastructure, and we can enable them to do their best work'," he said.
Microsoft is building its own large language model (LLM) to take on those from Google and OpenAI, The Information reported on Monday. The new model, called MAI-1, will have roughly 500 billion parameters, the report said. OpenAI's GPT-4 is thought to have about one trillion parameters.
Scott appeared to confirm the report about MAI-1 in a LinkedIn post on Monday: "Microsoft, and the teams making and operating things on occasion need to do their own custom work, whether that's training a model from scratch, or fine tuning a model that someone else has built."
He added: "There will be more of this in the future too. Some of these models have names like Turing, and MAI. Some, like Phi for instance, we even open source."
Microsoft didn't immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider, sent outside normal working hours.
A passenger had their flight ticket canceled after trying to smuggle a bag of snakes in their pants past TSA
Courtesy of TSA Gulf
A passenger was caught with a bag of snakes in their pants at Miami International Airport.The Daily Mail reported the passenger's flight ticket was subsequently canceled.Incidents of wildlife smuggling through airports are more common in Asia.A passenger was caught trying to smuggle a bag of snakes onto a plane at Miami International Airport last month.
Transportation Security Agency officials said officers detected the small bag "hidden in a passenger's pants" on April 26.
They shared pictures of the two small snakes and the bag in question, an Oakley sunglasses bag in camouflage colors.
Officers at @iflymia detected this bag of snakes hidden in a passenger’s pants at a checkpoint on Fri, April 26. @TSA called our @CBPSoutheast and Miami-Dade Police partners in to assist, and the snakes were turned over to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. pic.twitter.com/CggJob8IT8
— TSA_Gulf (@TSA_Gulf) April 30, 2024Upon discovering the reptiles at a security checkpoint, the TSA called in the police and Customs and Border Protection. The snakes were then taken away by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.
The Daily Mail reported that the passenger's flight ticket was canceled as a result of the incident.
It's unclear whether the snakes were their pets, or if they were being trafficked out of the country.
Stories of people attempting to smuggle wildlife through airports aren't that rare, although they are more common in Asia. In March, The Guardian reported six people were arrested in Thailand after officials found 87 animals inside their luggage — including lizards, birds, and a red panda.
Kanitha Krishnasamy, from Traffic — an NGO focused on the illegal wildlife trade — told The Guardian there had been a "very active and persistent level of trafficking of live animals between Southeast Asia and South Asia."
"Airlines and the transport sector play a crucial role, as frontliners who come across these bags being loaded onto a plane or sent as cargo," she added.
"They have the ability not only to detect but collaborate with enforcement agencies to identify the parties involved in the trafficking chain."
US Customs and Border Protection said in 2023 that wildlife smuggling is "one of the most profitable natural resource crimes."
Veteran analysts say the world's biggest private-equity firm could be in big trouble
Getty Images; Alyssa Powell/BI
In 2017, Blackstone — the world's largest private-equity firm, which usually caters to big institutions and the very wealthy — decided to give ordinary investors an opportunity to get in on the firm's magic. It created BREIT, a private fund that buys commercial real estate like warehouses and apartment buildings, and marketed it to everyday investors as an "all-weather strategy to build long-term wealth across market cycles."
And it was magic: By offering an annual dividend of about 4% in a world where interest rates were close to zero, BREIT quickly became a giant. At its peak in 2021, the fund was attracting as much as $3 billion a month in new investments. Today, BREIT boasts assets of $114 billion — about 8% of Blackstone's entire fee-earning assets — and has generated over $5 billion in management and performance fees.
But over the past two years, some investors have grown suspicious that BREIT isn't the rock-solid investment Blackstone claims it is. Since its inception, the fund says it has delivered an annualized net return of 10.5% — almost double an index of publicly traded REITs. Even as commercial real estate has been battered in the wake of the pandemic, BREIT has somehow managed to defy gravity, outperforming comparable funds by seemingly fantastic margins. In the fall of 2022, after the Fed's interest-rate increases began to shake the commercial real-estate market, investors began asking for their money back — more than $15 billion to date. Faced with a run on the fund, Blackstone cited a provision that allowed it to take its time refunding antsy investors — a decision that only served to further alarm the market. Shares in Blackstone tumbled by nearly 20%. Last year, BREIT failed to generate enough cash to cover its annual dividend.
In recent months, the fund has appeared to recover from the debacle. BREIT announced it was able to fulfill 100% of the repurchase requests it received in February, which had slowed to just under $1 billion. Amid the promise of a rebound, Blackstone's stock has regained almost 50% from its lows. "I believe we'll look back at 2023 as the cyclical bottom for our firm," Steve Schwarzman, Blackstone's CEO, told analysts at an earnings call in January.
Investors in Blackstone's real-estate fund asked for their money back in droves — more than $15 billion to date.Jeenah Moon/Reuters
But the rosy picture that Blackstone paints may not tell the whole story. In recent months I've spoken with veteran analysts, accountants, and investors who have come to believe that BREIT is essentially a house of cards. That's because the returns the fund claims it has delivered depend almost entirely on BREIT's own estimates, which skeptics believe are wildly inflated. What's more, when BREIT faced a flood of redemption requests from investors, it only fulfilled all those requests after raising cash from new investors — including one that received a sweetheart deal from Blackstone to invest in BREIT. "It is the absolute definition of a Ponzi scheme," said Nate Koppikar, who runs a hedge fund called Orso Partners that has shorted Blackstone's stock because of concerns over BREIT. Unless the real-estate market comes roaring back, analysts warn, BREIT could end up shrinking to a fraction of its current size, leaving the fund's investors holding the bag.
"Surveying some of the ways that Blackstone has misled investors over the past five months, we are more convinced than ever that BREIT is a bad investment created for the benefit of Blackstone," Craig McCann, a financial analyst who served as an economist at the Securities Exchange Commission, wrote last year. "Investors should not accept anything Blackstone and BREIT state as truthful."
It's impossible to know exactly how valuable BREIT is. Because the fund is not publicly traded, the market doesn't set its price per share — Blackstone does. You buy shares in BREIT based on your faith in Blackstone's investing brilliance and in the firm's account of its own performance. Investing in a private real-estate trust like BREIT is, ultimately, an exercise in trust.
BREIT's returns are based on a measure called net asset value, or NAV. That's supposed to be the value of all the assets the fund owns, minus its debt. Blackstone told Business Insider that it has an "incredibly rigorous valuation process" — one it says has led it to adjust its NAV more aggressively than other REITS. But BREIT doesn't let investors or regulators see some of the crucial assumptions that go into calculating its NAV. As BREIT's financial documents state, Blackstone "is ultimately and solely responsible for the determination of our NAV." The methods used to calculate it are "not prescribed by rules of the SEC or any other regulatory agency," and the NAV "is not audited by our independent registered public accounting firm."
Chilton Capital Management, which invests in publicly traded REITs, analyzed the way Blackstone adjusts the value of BREIT to reflect changes in the underlying real estate it owns. Rather than being "marked to market" every day — or every millisecond, like public REITS — Blackstone adjusts its NAV on a monthly basis. In today's volatile real-estate market, that means its stated value can lag way behind reality. "It inherently is a flawed process when prices are changing quickly," Chilton observes. "We refer to this imperfect appraisal process as 'mark to magic.'" In 2022, after the crash in commercial real estate, publicly traded REITs that own assets similar to BREIT's — multifamily housing and industrial buildings — have been selling at sharp discounts. But BREIT, by "marking to magic," has continued to claim far higher returns. Using a collection of market-based metrics, Chilton concluded last April that BREIT was overstating the value of its NAV by more than 55%.
McCann, who is now a principal at SLCG Economics Consulting, reached a similar conclusion. He calculated that the cumulative returns of other funds in the sectors in which BREIT is concentrated plunged by over 30% in 2022. Yet BREIT claimed that its value increased during the same period. In the dry language of market analysts, McCann called the fund's claims about its NAV "unreliable."
Blackstone considers such comparisons unfair. It insists that BREIT shouldn't be compared to publicly traded funds, which it argues are more volatile than private offerings. In a statement to BI, the firm insists that BREIT is able to outperform other funds for a simple reason: because it owns better assets than they do. BREIT's portfolio, Blackstone says, is "concentrated in the best performing sectors (data centers, logistics and student housing) and geographies (virtually no urban exposure)." Only 3% of BREIT's holdings are in office buildings, which have been ground zero for commercial real estate pain. The company points to its performance during the global financial crisis of 2008 as evidence of its ability to outperform its competitors during "periods of dislocation" and notes that it has sold $20 billion of real estate since the beginning of 2022, when interest rates began to rise, generating a profit of $4 billion.
"Not all real estate is created equal," BREIT boasted in a recent letter to stockholders, "and where you invest matters."
One of four commercial centers Blackstone owns near Lisbon. The company argues that BREIT's valuation remains high because the assets in its portfolio are superior to those in other funds.Horacio Villalobos/Getty Images
But Blackstone's principal claim — that sounder investments have led to higher returns — is difficult to square with the ongoing decline of commercial real estate. It's hard to fathom how BREIT could have bought so many properties at the height of the market and yet somehow been selective enough to have dodged all the post-pandemic downturns suffered by other funds. According to BREIT's own numbers, data centers and student housing make up only a small part of its portfolio. And many of the data centers Blackstone says have already created so much value for the fund aren't even up and running yet — they're still in development.
Publicly traded REITs, meanwhile, aren't the only ones marking down their assets. Bluerock Total Income + Real Estate, which has over $300 billion invested in a host of institutional real estate funds, has marked its NAV back to pre-pandemic levels — down more than 20% from its peak. Other major investors, unlike Blackstone, apparently don't see their real estate holdings as immune from the chaos buffeting the rest of the market.
Blackstone also argues in its marketing material that BREIT is better positioned than other real-estate funds because its balance sheet is "substantially hedged," meaning it has fixed-rate debt and derivatives in place that protect against rising interest rates. That's true — for the moment. But BREIT's future cash flows are, in fact, very sensitive to interest rates. At the end of last year, BREIT had $62 billion of debt secured by its properties, and it paid an effective interest rate of 4.3% that it locked in before rates spiked. But $47 billion of that debt will come due over the next four years — and if rates stay elevated, BREIT could face over $1 billion in added interest costs. That, BREIT has warned investors, "could reduce our cash flows and our ability to make distributions to you." Investing in BREIT is essentially a bet that interest rates are going to fall — because if they don't, it could be ruinous.
You might argue that it ultimately doesn't matter if BREIT is overvaluing its NAV. As long as investors keep getting their hefty annual dividends, who cares? That's basically the same argument that Donald Trump made in defending himself against charges of systematically overstating his assets — that everybody made money, so no one was defrauded. But miscalculating the value of a vehicle like BREIT inflates the fees investors pay for participating in the fund while simultaneously depriving them of the opportunity to accurately assess the risk they're taking. In addition, Blackstone is incentivized to overvalue its NAV, because that's the number it uses to calculate the management and performance fees that investors pay. "It's a text-book example of conflict of interests," Robert Chang, the head of securities litigation at Fideres, a consulting firm that specializes in investigating corporate wrongdoing, wrote in a piece about BREIT. Fideres calculates that since early 2022, the fund's NAV per share has remained relatively stable — while public REITs have lost more than 30% of their value. If BREIT's assets are indeed overvalued, Fideres estimates, investors may have overpaid management and performance fees to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars a year.
The alarm bells over BREIT go beyond whether Blackstone is overstating the fund's value. BREIT has said that through June of last year, 100% of its dividends were funded by cash flows from operations — the money produced by its real-estate assets. But that claim is more than a little misleading. In the measure of cash that BREIT highlights, it doesn't subtract the expenditures required to maintain its properties, which is standard for the industry. In its own fine print, in fact, BREIT does provide several other measures that are more analogous to how most REITS define cash flow; by those measures, the fund has never been able to cover its dividend from its cash flow.
No one I spoke with believes that Blackstone set out to build a house of cards. Rather, they say, BREIT was a victim of its own success.In its response to BI, Blackstone argues that because its management fees are not paid in cash, they are "properly excluded" from some of its measures. But not being able to pay the dividend you've promised can be seen as a Ponzi-ish warning, because it means the money has to come from selling off assets, borrowing money, or attracting new investors — a reality that BREIT acknowledges on the third page of its financial documents (and one that the SEC has noted as a risk factor for all private REITS). And if you subtract Blackstone's fees, BREIT has covered less than 50% of its dividend distribution since its inception. Indeed, one of the primary reasons BREIT has been able to pay its dividends is because roughly half of all shareholders have elected to receive their dividends not in cash, but in more shares of BREIT. In other words, the game depends on the continued belief of investors — on their willingness to accept shares of BREIT in lieu of cash.
Getting paid in shares, of course, is not the same as getting paid in cash. The more shares BREIT issues to pay the dividend — and its fees to Blackstone — the less each share is worth. "On the surface, it all looks so safe," McCann tells BI. "You're getting 4% or so a year, and you think it looks like a bond, and you think the underlying investments are doing well. Only when you dig in do you figure out that even if you're taking cash, the money is a return of capital, not a return on capital."
In 2022, when investors started asking for their money back in droves, BREIT faced a big problem. If its assets weren't marked correctly, it couldn't sell them off to pay investors without fessing up. Then the fund got what looked like a vote of confidence. In January 2023, BREIT announced that the University of California had decided to invest $4 billion in the fund, giving it a much-needed infusion of cash. Schwarzman called the investment a "validation" of BREIT's strategy.
But it wasn't. To entice the university to invest, Blackstone had offered it a special deal. BREIT agreed to award the university an additional $1 billion in stock in the event that the fund's rate of return fell below 11.25%. The deal was so sweet that UC's Board of Regents quickly agreed to invest another $500 million on the same terms.
"Contrary to Blackstone's spin," wrote McCann, "the University of California investment strongly supports the view that BREIT is a terrible investment."
Students at the University of California protested the school system's investment in BREIT, which came after Blackstone offered a special guarantee on the deal.Michael Blackshire/Getty Images
Scoring the new investment helped BREIT pay off all those who wanted to exit the fund, albeit slowly. And for the moment, the stampede appears to have subsided.
Blackstone says that BREIT has "access to ample liquidity across multiple sources," including "$119.1 billion of high-quality real estate that can be sold at market prices if we choose to do so." But if investors stage another rush for the doors, BREIT could face a serious reckoning, especially given its high level of debt. If it has overvalued its properties, as some experts suggest, then it will have to sell its assets at a price below where they are marked. And the more shareholders it has to redeem, the faster its equity will become worthless. Those who get their money out early will be OK. Those who are last in line, not so much.
"If BREIT has to sell properties to meet redemptions, and they have to dip deeper into their portfolio to sell less desirable properties, they'll have to mark their NAV to reflect the actual sales prices," says Phil Bak, the founder and CEO of Armada Investors, a quantitative asset manager that specializes in REITs. "That could scare the people who have been clinging to fund performance as a reason not to redeem, which in turn causes a death spiral."
No one I spoke with believes that Blackstone set out to build a house of cards. Rather, they say, BREIT was a victim of its own success. Money poured in at the height of the market, meaning that BREIT invested at a moment when commercial real estate was priced to perfection. Real estate, by its nature, is always somewhat illiquid — you can't sell your share of an apartment building on the stock market. And in a bad market, it's very illiquid, especially if what you own is marked at a price where no one will buy it. But while Blackstone says it designed BREIT so investors could get their money out, it seems not to have foreseen that scores of individual investors — unlike the big institutions that have typically been its clients, who are forced to commit their funds for long periods of time — might get spooked enough to ask for their money back all at the same time. Titans of Wall Street often believe that their brilliance should insulate them from skepticism. Their supreme confidence in their own wisdom is perhaps their most marketable asset.
It's completely possible, of course, that BREIT will survive, no matter how flawed its model might be. If the real-estate market reignites, that will boost the value of the assets in funds like BREIT. And if enough new investors are willing to place bets on BREIT — if trust in Blackstone's "magic" remains high — then everyone will keep making money, if only on paper, even if BREIT is overvaluing its assets. Blackstone's success has already created at least three billionaires, chief among them its CEO, Steve Schwarzman, who is worth almost $40 billion. The ability to enrich yourself seems to be a key part of what inspires others to follow your investment advice.
CEO Stephen Schwarzman insists the worst is behind Blackstone, even as analysts remain worried about BREIT's prospects in a volatile market.Shannon Stapleton/Reuters
But there are plenty of warning signs that things could get worse. It's unlikely that the market will pick up fast enough to offset BREIT's woes. "Commercial real estate is a slow burn," Brian Moynihan, the CEO of Bank of America, recently observed. In its financial statements, Blackstone says it continues to count on "high single-digit growth" in its two biggest sectors, rental housing and industrial properties. But BREIT's overall growth was just 6% last year, and it has been decelerating quarter over quarter. If the market continues to fall, it will be harder for BREIT to claim it's the shining exception.
To make matters worse, the way BREIT is structured could prove to be a ticking time bomb. Like other private vehicles, BREIT pays hefty commissions to financial advisors who steer their clients to the fund. All told, Blackstone has paid Wall Street banks and brokers more than $700 million in brokerage fees. But for brokers who put their clients in BREIT early on, those commissions could soon hit a mandated cap of 8.75% — meaning they'll no longer be incentivized to sell the fund. If they start advising their clients to exit BREIT, it could spur an even bigger rush for the doors.
The future of BREIT could also send shock waves through Blackstone's bottom line. In 2022 alone, SLCG calculated, fees from BREIT generated 13.3% of Blackstone's total management fees and 12.6% of its performance revenue. If BREIT and its sister fund, BPP, are forced to slash their NAVs by 50%, the ensuing reduction in fees would wipe out over 15% of Blackstone's fee-related earnings — earnings that Wall Street, in contrast, is expecting will grow by 15%. According to Blackstone's financial statements, it's already anticipating it will have to pay the University of California $564 million in BREIT stock — an expense it doesn't count in the numbers it highlights to Wall Street. If BREIT craters, it will also be difficult for Blackstone to live up to Wall Street's expectations for its long-term earnings growth, which depend in part on its successful expansion into the retail market.
There are bigger issues at stake than Blackstone's bottom line. It's worth remembering, as Chilton notes, that private funds like BREIT were among "the biggest losers" during the global financial crisis of 2008. But that lesson seems lost on today's investors, who have once again flocked to private real-estate funds in a time of extreme market volatility. In the two years after the pandemic hit, private funds like BREIT raised $67 billion — far more than they drummed up in the two years leading up to the Great Recession. "While the tombstones may have different names on them," Chilton observes, "the reasons for the demise of private equity real estate players are going to rhyme, and possibly mirror those from the global financial crisis."
That's why the story of BREIT involves more than profits and losses. It's only recently that private-equity firms like Blackstone have started offering products to ordinary investors. "BREIT was a test case for the whole industry," says Koppikar, of Orso Partners. Perhaps, given the questions swirling around BREIT, it's time to rethink whether the world's wealthiest funds should be trusted to take billions of dollars in fees from ordinary investors without more oversight. As it stands, it's impossible to know what BREIT's assets are actually worth — and therein lies the problem. In the absence of a market price, independent accounting and tighter government regulation are needed to ensure that investors have the accurate, verifiable numbers they need to make informed decisions. With private funds like BREIT, too much maneuvering takes place in the dark. And if history is any lesson, the dark is a very bad place to be doing business.
Bethany McLean is a special correspondent at Business Insider.
Saudi Arabia needs peace in the Middle East for its $500 billion Neom megaproject to succeed
Neom
Conflict in the Middle East is a threat to Saudi Arabia's ambitious Vision 2030 plans.Some Neom projects are located along the Red Sea coast, where tensions have been escalating.The renewed conflict in the region has left Saudi officials walking a difficult political line.Escalating tensions in the Middle East are threatening the success of Saudi Arabia's ambitious Vision 2030 plans — especially its desert megacity called Neom.
The kingdom has announced grand plans to boost its tourism industry to 150 million visitors a year by 2030, aiming to build new resorts and cities that will act as Dubai-style travel hubs in the region.
But many of these planned tourist destinations are located on the Red Sea coast, where tensions have been escalating since the October 7 Hamas attacks on Israel and the subsequent conflict in Gaza and beyond.
Iran-backed Houthis have launched numerous missiles and armed drone attacks at Israel and the threat of ongoing conflict has disrupted Red Sea shipping routes, with companies opting to avoid the area.
The conflict in the region has left Saudi officials walking a political tightrope.
Earlier steps toward normalizing relations with Israel have been derailed by a resurgence of local support for the Palestinian cause, while the threat of prolonged conflict risks hobbling officials lofty goals for Neom.
A de-escalating force
Before the October Hamas attacks, Saudi Arabia already appeared to be seeking de-escalation and normalization with its foreign policy in the region.
In March 2023, Iran and Saudi Arabia brokered a deal to re-establish diplomatic relations. With some help from China, the two nations agreed to reopen their embassies in their respective capitals.
In the months before October 7, Saudi Arabia was also reportedly edging toward a deal with the US that would have included a normalization agreement with Israel. According to a New York Times report, one reason is that it's hoping for a US security guarantee if it's ever attacked by Iran.
Progress on the deal appeared to stall after the Israeli offensive in Gaza sparked anger across the region, leaving Saudi officials caught between a wave of local support for the Palestinian cause and US pressure to normalize ties with Israel.
While Saudi Arabia has called for an end to the war in Gaza and accused Israel of committing war crimes, officials have continued to express interest in normalizing relations with the Jewish homeland as long as any deal includes the creation of a Palestinian state.
The US and Saudi Arabia are in the final steps of a new agreement on security guarantees and civilian nuclear assistance, Reuters reported last week. Normalization of an Israeli-Saudi relations is still far from being agreed.
International optics
The conflict in the region poses a problem for Saudi's hopes of attracting millions of new foreign visitors.
Kristian Coates Ulrichsen, a fellow for the Middle East at Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy, told Business Insider: "The Saudis are so concerned about any potential escalation because they realize they have this largely untapped Red Sea coastline, which they are now developing and see a lot of potential in."
Many of Neom's projects aimed at capturing the luxury tourism market are located along the Red Sea coast. Set to open next year, Neom's luxury island resort of Sindalah is advertised as an "exclusive gateway to the stunning Red Sea."
A rendering of Sindalah in the Red Sea, an island resort that's part of the Neom project.NEOM
Saudi officials need to show that the locations are safe from nearby conflict zones to be able to attract high-spending visitors.
"The optics of stray missiles and drones slamming into Saudi cities when they're trying to attract the sort of high-end luxury markets would be disastrous," Ulrichsen said.
The 2022 Formula 1 Grand Prix in Jeddah, which took place against a backdrop of thick black smoke after Houthi missiles hit a fuel depot five miles away from the racetrack, is unlikely to be far from officials' minds.
After the attack, plumes of black smoke were visible from the circuit and seen during the first practice session, sparking alarm from international drivers.
Supply chain issues
Conflict in the region may also cause issues when it comes to the construction of ambitious projects like Neom.
"The remote location of the project, combined with renewed tensions in the Red Sea, also pose specific issues around construction and delivery of equipment and materials," Robert Mogielnicki, a senior resident scholar at the Arab Gulf States Institute, told BI.
Officials will also need to convince firms and residents to buy into Neom and attract tourists to visit. Mogielnicki said these demand-related variables mean the Saudi government and planners have less direct control over Neom's success.
Saudi officials are already fighting to combat claims that Neom is facing delays and setbacks.
In recent months, Western media outlets have reported that the country is scaling back population estimates for The Line and seeking to borrow funds.
Last month, Bloomberg reported that the financial realities of the project, which could see cost spiral up to $1.5 trillion, have started to cause alarm within the Saudi government.
Difficulties getting construction materials to the Red Sea coast could further delay some Neom projects, which are essentially already "moving targets," according to Ulrichsen.
Neom did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.
AI 'pilots' are getting so good they're sometimes beating humans in dogfights
US Air Force/Airman 1st Class Dwane R. Young
Some AI-controlled fighter jets are outperforming human pilots in dogfights, per the AP.The outlet witnessed an hourlong experimental flight at the Edwards Air Force Base in California.The Air Force is reportedly planning a fleet of more than 1,000 AI-enabled unmanned warplanes.Some AI-controlled F-16 fighter jets are already outperforming human pilots in dogfights, according to a report from the Associated Press.
The AP reported this finding after witnessing an hourlong experimental flight at the Edwards Air Force Base in California.
During the flight, the AI-controlled F-16, called Vista, performed maneuvers at more than 550 miles an hour with Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall on board.
While the AI system is still in its early days, the AP reported that some versions of the tech are learning so rapidly that they have outperformed pilots in air-to-air combat.
Representatives for the US military did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider, made outside normal working hours.
The US Air Force has been actively exploring AI, which has been cited as a transformative technology for military action globally.
Although the technology is not yet fully developed, the AP reported that the force plans to build up a fleet of more than 1,000 AI-enabled unmanned warplanes. The first AI-controlled jets are set to be in operation by 2028, per the report.
Kendall told the outlet he'd seen enough during the experimental flight to trust the technology to decide whether to launch weapons in a war.
Industry experts and human rights activists have warned an using AI to make autonomous decisions during military action could lead to errors and unintended casualties.
A recent report claimed Israel was using AI to help identify targets in its war against Hamas without thorough human oversight. The IDF denied the claims at the time in a statement to BI.
Tweets by iStartValley
Discover the Entrepreneur in You and
prepare for the 21st Century Skills
WHAT THEY SAYTESTIMONIALSOUR GREAT CLIENTS
“The involvement of iStart Valley in the startup community has provided an outlet for people to pursue innovation and entrepreneurship. Without their efforts, I would not have met my current co-founder. A catalyst would be how I see them within the startup ecosystem.”
“iStart Valley is an incredible resource for anyone with an early stage start up to gain some technical knowledge revolving around business model and commercializing your product. Their weekly session will give you the vocabulary you need to speak with authority to clients, customers, and in.”
“The road was not an easy one. I had to keep my day job for two years, which slowed me down considerably. Three important things kept me going: first, ending second at Startup Weekend validated my project. Second, iStart Valley gave me invaluable moral support, and its educational workshops and.”
“iStart Valley has a completely revolutionary process as to how to assist start-ups in getting started and be prepared for success. They bring you some of the best resources and as long as you bring a good ethic, you will be set up for success. They introduce you to some of the most seasoned.”
“iWe are making significant progress continuing to work with iStart.”
“The workshops & educational resources at iStart Valley will help you to create a successful business from a simple idea. Their invaluable source of contacts is instrumental to any startuper in the North Florida area. I highly recommend all entrepreneurs to get in touch with them. It rea.”
“MomentStrong feels very fortunate to be associated with the iStart Valley team. We participated in workshops, training sessions and other events. They even helped connect us to potential investors. I think my favorite part has been the camaraderie and sense of team with all the other entrep.”
“The personal attention, guidance and mentoring from iStart Valley helped us in understanding the startup ecosystem and coming up with the best strategy to develop a world-class enterprise level product. We are fortunate to collaborate with them in our journey towards success and look forward.”
“iStart Valley program has a one-of-a-kind schedule flexibility that's perfect for bootstrapped and early-stage startups. Their structure helped me fit the meetings and online assignments around my day job, family, and other responsibilities. It's covers all the best practices you.”